By Katrina Zarina, member of the EESC Employers’ Group and rapporteur ECO/697 “Strategy for Eastern border regions”

From the Baltic to the Black Sea, Europe’s eastern border regions are no longer outlying corners of the Union. They are where Europe’s security and sovereignty are tested – daily, brutally, and without pretense.

In the shadow of Russia’s war against Ukraine and Belarus’s complicity, these regions have become the EU’s strategic vanguard. Yet Brussels still treats them as a cohesion issue rather than a geopolitical emergency.

The European Commission’s Communication, “Strong regions for a safe Europe,” moves in the right direction by recognizing their strategic role. But the paper reads like a diagnosis without a treatment plan, and without the funding to match.

These regions face a convergence of pressures that standard EU tools cannot address: hybrid warfare, demographic decline with losses of over 17% in a decade, and economic disruption as the Russia’s invasion has cut growth, driven inflation, and severed trade routes, turning cross-border hubs into dead ends.

This cannot be solved with cohesion tools, as it is a geopolitical fault line.

At the same time, these regions have demonstrated remarkable resilience and, have rapidly reduced energy dependence on Russia, strengthened defence capabilities, and adapted their economies under extreme pressure. They have become testing grounds for innovation in security, logistics, and crisis response, while maintaining open markets and supporting Ukraine.

This resilience is not only a success story; it is a competitive advantage. It shows that, with the right support, these regions can serve as engines of stability, innovation, and growth for Europe as a whole.

Initiatives like the Eastern Flank Watch and the European Drone Defence Initiative are welcome, but  cohesion policy alone cannot withstand a shock of this scale.

What is needed is a unified EU shield – across land, air, sea, cyber, and space – backed by dedicated crisis funding. Dual-use infrastructure must be prioritized: TEN-T corridors from the Baltic to the Black Sea and Aegean; resilient energy grids free from Russian gas; rail links to Ukraine and Moldova for trade recovery; and digital connectivity via fibre and IRIS. These investments must support local jobs, SMEs, and regional supply chains.

The Commission’s reliance on reallocating existing funds through mid-term cohesion tweaks and higher co-financing,is not a strategy, it’s incrementalism. The scale of the challenge exceeds national budgets.

There is no other way than to call for new funding in the 2028–2034 Multiannual Financial Framework: targeted support under the European Competitiveness Fund throug specific programm calls for eastern border regions.

An EastInvest Facility should be launched now, combining grants, InvestEU and EIB guarantees to lower SME borrowing costs, and one-stop shops for investors. State aid rules should be revised and adapted for eastern border regions specific needs, alongside stronger investment support.

The focus must shift from compensation to transformation, including Horizon Europe missions for defence technologies, bioeconomy, and clean energy clusters. This is not about patching gaps, but about rebuilding resilience.

At the same time, EU youth programmes – ALMA, the Youth Guarantee, the Solidarity Corps – must evolve into retention tools offering skills, housing, and childcare in order to tackle the demographic silent crisis.

A Demographic Revitalisation Initiative should support families and returnees, alongside mental health measures for populations living under sustained pressure. Cultural and educational programmes can strengthen societal resilience: this is a security policy.

The Commission should anchor this approach through an annual high-level dialogue on eastern border regions, a post-MFF strategic framework under the Territorial Agenda 2030, and regular monitoring of socio-economic and security indicators. These regions must be treated as a shared European priority.

Europe’s East is not the periphery , it’s the frontline. Strong regions mean a safe Europe, but only if ambition is matched with resources. The European Economic and Social Committee has outlined the path in its opinion “Strategy for Eastern border regiorns”. The EU must now follow it.